[ad_1]
It is conceivable that Button acquired the car for Ward, and as per the Daily Mail, court documents suggest Button offered to transfer the Bronco’s registration to his name. The documents also mention that Eccles requested specific changes to the car, like the addition of rear seatbelts, which Button promptly completed. Additionally, Eccles asked Button to store the Bronco until arrangements could be made for its shipment and registration, to which Button agreed.
Presently, Eccles seeks to nullify the sale and reclaim his money due to the ownership discrepancy. Button is countering Eccles’ claims with a charge of “defamatory relief,” alleging that Eccles is attempting to retract from the agreement because of challenges in registering the car in South Africa, where he is currently situated.
If the assertions of both parties are accurate, it appears that Button is acting reasonably, offering to transfer the Bronco’s registration to his name, covering the cost of modifications, and providing storage since the sale for Eccles. Whether Ward bought the Bronco independently or Button purchased it for her remains uncertain; nonetheless, it was a vehicle frequently driven by the F1 champion. Furthermore, now that he is married to the proprietor, it has become a family vehicle for him.
What started as a simple transaction has transformed into a convoluted legal tussle. The resolution of this predicament and whether Eccles will eventually take possession of the Bronco or compel Button to issue a refund await further developments.
Have any leads? Share them at tips@thedrive.com
[ad_2]