The fuel efficiency numbers for the 2020 Lincoln Aviator Grand Touring edition have finally been disclosed, and as anticipated, the figures are superior for this plug-in hybrid variation compared to standard Aviator models. While the stats aren’t significantly improved, the EPA has assigned a combined 23 MPG rating to this luxurious people carrier. In contrast, the standard AWD Aviator achieves 20 MPG combined from its twin-turbo V6 engine, while the rear-wheel-drive model slightly outperforms with 21 MPG.
Hot Rod Lincoln:
It’s vital to understand that these figures do not account for the Aviator Grand Touring’s electric mode of operation. When factored in, the MPGe rating stands at 56 combined with an all-electric range of 21 miles. This figure is marginally better than the initial 18-mile estimate provided by Lincoln, and it represents a positive advancement in the increasingly competitive PHEV SUV market. While it may not cover the average 30-mile daily commute in the U.S., it handles a significant portion of the journey, reducing trips to the gas station.
Gallery: 2020 Lincoln Aviator Grand Touring: First Drive
It is noteworthy that this premium SUV boasts significant power. The EcoBoost V6 engine and electric power unit collaborate to produce 494 horsepower (368 kilowatts) and a substantial amount of low-end torque – precisely 630 pound-feet (854 Newton-meters). Despite its substantial weight of nearly three tons, this elegant SUV can accelerate to 60 mph in about 5.5 seconds. These performance figures are commendable for a vehicle capable of transporting more than two individuals, and the Aviator Grand Touring can accommodate up to seven passengers.
This blend of efficiency, luxury, and performance does come at a cost. The Aviator Grand Touring’s base price is $68,800, which can escalate to over $91,000 with all available options added. For an additional $10,000, you could opt for a Mercedes-AMG GLE 63, which also accommodates seven passengers and offers superior acceleration. However, the Mercedes is considerably more expensive to fuel and arguably not as aesthetically appealing.
