In today’s America, the importance of facts sometimes seems overshadowed by personal beliefs, online echo chambers, and the prevalence of misinformation. However, some truths remain irrefutable, such as the color of the sky, the roundness of the earth, and the surprising performance of a Kia over a BMW.
To clarify, this isn’t a sensationalized story with exaggerated claims. The 2021 Kia K5 GT, featuring a 290-horsepower turbocharged engine and a dual-clutch transmission, achieves a faster 0-60 mph time and superior handling compared to the rear-wheel-drive 2020 BMW 330i, which has a 255-horsepower turbo-four engine.
These observations have become accepted truths in the automotive world, much like established comparisons of cargo space between different vehicle types. The difference in acceleration seems consistent with the horsepower figures; yet when it comes to cornering and overall handling, the Kia K5 GT, priced about $10,000 less, outperforms a well-regarded luxury brand. The automotive landscape continues to surprise us.
I anticipate that some readers may be skeptical, particularly those who take pride in their new BMW models. I sympathize; I own an older BMW and often rationalize its high upkeep costs by deeming it a “driver’s car.” But let’s focus on the facts.
The win for the Kia K5 GT over the BMW 330i isn’t just speculation; it’s backed by AMCI Testing, a reputable company that independently verifies automotive claims. This organization is dedicated to ensuring the truth about car performance reaches consumers without bias.
AMCI Testing serves as a neutral party in the auto industry, helping manufacturers substantiate their claims. When automakers want to confidently assert they outperform a competitor, they enlist AMCI for a thorough, unbiased assessment.
Although AMCI rarely speaks publicly, their importance was evident during a recent testing session between the Kia and the BMW, which took place at a former military airstrip in Southern California. The Drive had the opportunity to observe these evaluations firsthand.
To get scientific: Testing utilized factory-standard tires—Pirelli P-Zero all-seasons on the Kia and Bridgestone Turanza run-flats on the BMW. Despite any misinformation circulated otherwise, the K5 GT is not equipped with summer performance tires.
In terms of acceleration, the K5 GT manages to reach 60 mph in 5.70 seconds, while the 330i clocks in at 5.98 seconds. The Kia also proved quicker over the quarter-mile, finishing in 14.21 seconds at a speed of 103.3 mph against the BMW’s 14.41 seconds at 99.5 mph.
During highway merging tests, the K5 GT required less distance to accelerate from 20 to 65 mph, needing 327 feet compared to the BMW’s 374 feet—exhibiting a consistent edge over similar tests.
On handling, despite the Kia’s stability control being partially active whereas the BMW could deactivate it fully, the K5 GT pulled 0.947 g in a quick 180-degree turn, compared to the BMW’s 0.920 g. Additionally, the Kia navigated a slalom course at a speed of 60.27 mph, edging out the 59.05 mph achieved by the BMW.
The Unknown World of Automotive Testing
AMCI Testing provides independent performance assessments, allowing manufacturers to make clear claims about their vehicles’ advantages in various aspects like acceleration and handling. But don’t mistake them for just another marketing facilitator. They serve as a crucial counterbalance in an industry rife with subjective claims and advertising hype, working to ensure consumers receive accurate information.
Chances are, AMCI has influenced your perception of the automotive market, whether by supporting a bold statement you’ve encountered or by protecting you from misleading claims that may have reached your feed.
Often, manufacturers consult AMCI early in a vehicle’s development or shortly before launch to gauge their car’s potential against competitors. Some clients, like Kia, specifically request comparisons focused on aspects such as handling and acceleration.
The stakes are high; the financial investment in a new model can be enormous, riding on its success or failure. AMCI’s extensive experience testing a range of vehicles for nearly every major automaker has garnered many threats of lawsuits over the last three decades, yet its certifyable results have never been effectively challenged.
Conducting Tests in a Controlled Environment
Marine Corps Air Station El Toro has become a vital testing ground for AMCI Testing. Once a key military aviation site, the 4,700-acre space now serves as an area for closed-course evaluations, although it has been diminishing as new developments emerge.
On a warm autumn morning, I arrived at El Toro to meet Guy Mangiamele, AMCI’s director of vehicle testing, who guided me to observe the testing setup involving a BMW 330i and a pre-production Kia K5 GT.
Present for the day were testing manager George Doganis and chief test driver Gary Thomason, both of whom have notched a combined 28 national autocross championships. It was evident that the testing values straightforwardness over flashiness, which may explain their lesser-known status in a field that typically thrives on marketing appeal.
This affable team shared insights born of decades of experience. They approach their assessments with the understanding that cars have definitive strengths and weaknesses, which guides AMCI in zeroing in on those critical performance differences.
“The media may have biases, but we stand by our commitment to fair comparisons. We don’t care who comes out on top, as long as the result reflects the true performance,” Doganis notes.
Mangiamele adds that their goal is to equip consumers with a clear understanding of their vehicle choices. He believes that the reputation of brands like BMW can make them default selections for many buyers, while lesser-known names need a compelling narrative to gain equal footing.
“Stories matter in decision-making. Our aim is to help convey honest narratives that empower the consumer’s choice,” Mangiamele explains with a grin.
Kia’s Competitive Edge
The automotive narrative unfolding reflects a remarkable transformation in recent years for Hyundai and Kia. With strategic design shifts, key executive hires, and improvements in quality and technology, these manufacturers have evolved from affordability-focused to strong competitors against both German and Japanese brands. They are now pushing to enhance performance further.
Hyundai’s recruitment of Albert Biermann from BMW’s M division in 2015 marked a pivotal moment, leading to the development of notable performance models like the Kia Stinger and Genesis G70 and showcasing a commitment to exhilarating driving experiences.
Both the Hyundai Elantra and Sonata sedans illustrate this approach with performance-oriented variants, while the K5’s core design is closely related to the Sonata, making it Kia’s own high-performance entry.
Today’s lineup includes appealing crossovers, an extensive array of hybrids and electric vehicles, as well as competitive pricing, positioning Hyundai and Kia as formidable contenders in the market. However, overcoming enduring perceptions rooted in previous car models is still a challenge.
While Kia has proven capable of competing directly with BMW, it still has much work ahead to change the minds of skeptical consumers.
Now that they know they can outperform at AMCI Testing, Kia is ready to showcase these results.
“Manufacturers often turn to us for a thorough evaluation of their competitive advantages,” Mangiamele explains, stating that Kia specifically aimed to prove itself against sport sedans, emphasizing performance metrics.
Upon contracting AMCI for a test, the team conducts preliminary assessments with the manufacturer’s vehicle and its competition to establish a performance baseline, ensuring the cars are acquired through local dealerships to ensure fairness.
If it’s apparent the client’s model may not secure the expected results, AMCI will notify the manufacturer and stop testing. But if a vehicle shows promise, AMCI will proceed, acknowledging that, in this case, Kia’s expectations for the K5 GT were justified.
“The input from engineers shapes realistic expectations, particularly when they are led by someone like Biermann, who understands BMW’s benchmarks,” Doganis shares.
Advanced Testing Technology
AMCI Testing’s reputation is built on its advanced testing protocols that often surpass those of individual reviewers. Their access to sophisticated instruments, like high-speed cameras and precision timers, elevates their evaluations beyond standard reviews available online.
AMCI also employs cutting-edge technology, such as an optical timing system for acceleration tests, utilizing high-definition cameras to capture precise movements and distances.
For most performance metrics like those evaluated between the Kia and BMW, a reliable timing system suffices. AMCI’s impeccable application of these systems allows them to conduct rigorous tests on a variety of metrics, including:
- 0-60 mph
- Quarter mile time and trap speed
- 20-65 mph highway merging
- 40-70 mph highway passing
- Dry/Wet slalom
- Dry/Wet 180-degree corner
- Dry/Wet double lane change (evasive maneuver)
A specific example is the 40-70 mph passing test. While it seems straightforward, capturing data accurately is crucial as speed can change fluidly on highways. The accuracy of distance measurements is paramount, requiring meticulous timing.
“While most magazines begin timing from a preset speed, we ensure our metrics reflect true acceleration by not artificially manipulating starting speeds,” claims Thomason.
AMCI also adopts a meticulous approach to handling assessments, gradually increasing speeds to determine a vehicle’s performance limits. The goal is to yield repeatable results that highlight the inherent performance capabilities of each car.
Doganis provides insight into the difference in slalom performance between both vehicles, noting that a mere 1 mph discrepancy can indicate operational limits, crucial in handling dynamics.
Discussing the overall results with the testers was enlightening. They expressed genuine enthusiasm for the K5 GT’s capabilities, highlighting its responsive engine and impressive cornering ability. In contrast, opinions on the BMW noted improved chassis balance but conveyed dissatisfaction with the steering feel.
(Some may argue bias since AMCI was hired by Kia; however, they remained tight-lipped about any prior work for BMW due to confidentiality agreements.)
Conclusive Findings Behind the Wheel
As part of the evaluation, I got behind the wheel of both vehicles alongside Thomason, allowing me to feel the nuanced differences in handling and acceleration for myself. The K5 GT performed flatter through corners, demonstrating exceptional stability.
While testing the K5 GT, one small speed increase noticeably affected performance, underscoring the precision engineering involved. I also had a chance to navigate the BMW, requiring more careful throttle management to maintain balance, showcasing a distinctly different driving experience.
The K5 GT excels in slalom maneuvers due to its inherent design, demonstrating stability without excessive oversteer. Thomason emphasized the benefits of understeering characteristics in such tests, and it was clear that the Kia handles deftly through the course.
Thomason pointed out that even with stability control active, the K5 maintains composure, allowing for a more forgiving driving experience without risking a loss of control. Despite my occasional struggles, the K5 GT demonstrated a level of handling unexpected from a sedan of its kind, showing it has established a serious presence on the road.
Kia’s Next Chapter
“Every vehicle has compromises,” says Mangiamele. His statement rings true across the automotive landscape.
He expounds, “It’s worth noting that every manufacturer is striving to balance capability with the limitations they face. Engineers at every automaker are exceptionally skilled and must navigate various constraints to achieve the best possible results.”
A well-rounded car that surprises through its performance showcases the synergy between design and engineering, emphasizing the collective efforts behind a successful model.
Given the K5 GT’s performance, Kia has begun publicizing its results, leveraging AMCI Testing data to bolster its marketing. The automaker prominently features these accomplishments on its website, emphasizing its newfound competitive edge.
While not every consumer may be swayed by a Kia sedan, one fact remains undeniably clear: it has the ability to out-handle a BMW while saving you a significant amount of money. This is a notable achievement indicative of Kia’s evolving reputation in today’s market.
Moreover, such testing principles could be invaluable beyond the automotive realm, highlighting a need for unbiased evaluation in various fields, potentially leading to a more informed public.
.
