The pursuit of autonomous driving remains a key goal for the trucking sector, as challenges related to the technology become increasingly apparent. California is poised to become one of the first states to permit trial runs of driverless semi trucks on public roads, following the introduction of regulations aimed at facilitating such tests. However, a group of Californians is actively advocating for the presence of human drivers, having witnessed the significant problems associated with driverless vehicles.
On August 30, the California Department of Motor Vehicles released the initial draft of regulations that could allow driverless semis on state roads, as reported by Automotive News. Up until now, California had prohibited the testing of autonomous vehicles weighing over 10,000 pounds on its roads. This move is seen as a significant step for an industry eager to explore real-world applications, promoting similar benefits to those touted for self-driving passenger vehicles. Proponents argue that driverless semis could enhance safety and reduce costs, partly by eliminating the required rest breaks for human drivers.
While opportunities for driverless semis are emerging, resistance is also growing. On August 31, the California State Assembly enacted a bill that mandates a human operator must be present in all self-driving semi trucks. This legislation gained support from both major political factions and the influential Teamsters union, and it now awaits Governor Gavin Newsom’s approval. Notably, Newsom vetoed a similar bill last year and is expected to either veto or allow this new measure to lapse without his signature. He aims to find a balanced approach, emphasizing the need to safely test and implement this developing technology while addressing potential job impacts.
Public skepticism regarding driverless vehicles is significant, particularly after witnessing incidents involving autonomous cars causing disturbances on California roads over the past two years. Given this context, the DMV is proceeding cautiously, opening the floor for public and expert feedback on its draft regulations until October 14. This delay may provide Texas an opportunity to launch its own driverless semi truck testing program sooner than California, with plans to commence by year-end.
Despite officials’ enthusiasm for driverless semis, public acceptance hinges on safety perceptions. Concerns over rogue Cruise AVs or Waymos colliding with pedestrians or repeating dangerous incidents are minor compared to the fear of an out-of-control 80,000-pound truck with no human driver at the helm. Should there be even a slight lapse in autonomous trucking tests, it’s likely Californians would respond with harsh public backlash. Perhaps they’d even resort to a The Fast and the Furious-style counterattack on runaway vehicles. And speaking of escapades, does anyone need a VCR? Don’t inquire about its origin.
.
