- Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) are frequently touted as a compromise-free option for electrifying your daily drive, but the situation is often more complicated.
- A recent report from J.D. Power reveals that PHEVs are costlier and less satisfying for consumers.
- For those considering a plug-in vehicle, opting for a fully electric vehicle (EV) is advisable. If an EV doesn’t suit your needs for any reason, a conventional hybrid or gasoline vehicle may be the better option.
The proposition seems straightforward: Plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) alleviate the infrastructure issues that electric vehicles (EVs) face at a lower cost, blending the advantages of both electric and internal combustion engine technology. This has made PHEVs popular among many Americans. However, this reasoning is fundamentally flawed. J.D. Power’s latest report clarifies the misconceptions.
First, the notion that everyone prefers plug-in hybrids is widespread, particularly among EV skeptics who argue that opting for hybrids over EVs is more practical, claiming that the market is being pressured into electrification. Ironically, just a decade ago, these same critics deemed both hybrids and PHEVs unnecessary. Despite their claims to represent public sentiment, PHEVs currently constitute a mere 2% of the auto market, as noted in the latest J.D. Power E-Vision Intelligence Report.
Lexus provides the NX compact crossover with options for internal combustion, hybrid, or plug-in hybrid drivetrain, with the PHEV being the priciest version, costing over $10,000 more than the hybrid.
Both hybrids and EVs account for approximately 10% of the total market share. This is not solely due to the limited availability of PHEVs; in fact, the opposite is true for hybrids. J.D. Power reports that there are currently 41 types of PHEVs available in the U.S., compared to 39 traditional hybrids. To provide context, there are 60 full EV models marketed. While hybrid and EV sales are showing growth this year, PHEV sales are on the decline, largely due to challenges faced by leading PHEV manufacturer Stellantis. Thus, the assumption that there is a strong demand for PHEVs does not hold up.
It’s also worth noting that, despite complaints about government subsidies, PHEVs are eligible for federal tax credits similar to those available for EVs. Still, the complexity involved in integrating robust electric drivetrains with internal combustion engines contributes to higher prices. J.D. Power states that the average transaction price for a compact PHEV SUV, after accounting for credits and incentives, is $48,700. In contrast, traditional hybrids average $37,700, while EVs are even more affordable at $36,900.
This means PHEVs are not only more expensive but also less popular than their EV, hybrid, and gas engine counterparts. You might assume that their ownership experience makes them worthwhile, allowing for emission-free daily driving and extended range for road trips. However, customer satisfaction is surprisingly low. The truth is that there is no reliable data on how many PHEV owners actually use the plug-in feature. It appears that fewer people do than one might expect; when uncharged, PHEVs consume more fuel than a comparable traditional hybrid due to their extra weight. Some studies suggest they may produce significantly more emissions than official estimates indicate.
It’s important to clarify: I don’t harbor animosity toward PHEVs. The original Chevy Volt (both first and second generations) were remarkable vehicles, particularly when EV options were limited in range and highly priced. However, as EVs have become more affordable and advanced, the case for PHEVs becomes less compelling.
Even when charged, PHEVs often lack the responsive acceleration that makes driving EVs enjoyable. Many times, their internal combustion engines must activate during high-power demands. The integration of throttle and brake systems can complicate smooth driving. Additionally, according to Consumer Reports, PHEVs show lower reliability compared to EVs or traditional internal combustion vehicles. Notably, manufacturers that excel in hybrid technology—like Honda, Toyota, and Ford—primarily focus on regular hybrids, offering PHEV options on limited models.
Moreover, PHEVs do not support direct current fast charging (DCFC), necessitating slower charging methods. For those without access to level 2 chargers for extended periods most days, these vehicles often function just like standard hybrids, as they typically need charging after a normal commute. Therefore, reliable charging at home or work is essential for effective PHEV use.
If you can consistently charge at either home or work, an EV may be a suitable choice. For those who frequently travel over 300 miles more than six times a year, a PHEV may be advantageous. However, for the majority, embracing the concept of completely gas-free commuting will yield a more cost-effective, smooth, reliable, and enjoyable experience. Those who find home or work charging impractical, those who often embark on long journeys, price-conscious consumers, and those hesitant to adopt new habits will appreciate the simplicity and effectiveness of conventional hybrid vehicles.
This may explain why PHEVs rank as the least satisfying vehicle type in J.D. Power’s data. The jack of all trades ultimately proves to be a master of none.
.
