[ad_1]
One common query is frequently raised: How can NASCAR enhance its on-track performance? This issue gains significance as Cup Series teams and manufacturers grapple with mastering the Next Gen car. While aero adjustments are typically the primary proposal, some individuals believe there might be a simpler solution. NASCAR could potentially inject a significant surge of power by incorporating abundant horsepower. According to Kyle Larson, Hendrick Motorsport could field a 1,000-hp car on the track in just one week without incurring additional expenses.
Larson, a champion in the Cup Series, representing one of the most dominant teams currently, elaborated on this during The Dale Jr. Download podcast:
“I’ve heard [Director of Powertrain at Hendrick Motorsports] Scott Maxim say we could bring 1,000 horsepower next week and it not cost any more. They’re literally taking the [670-horsepower] engine that I won with at Vegas and tweaking it into a 1,000-hp engine to install in one of Rick [Hendrick]’s personal vehicles currently under construction.”
Kyle Larson. Getty Images Getty Images
Setting aside fantasies of becoming Rick Hendrick, this notion seems unbelievable. However, the surprise factor diminishes upon considering that Chevrolet has nearly perfected the formula with their 358-cubic-inch pushrod V8s. So, why does NASCAR refrain from granting the Bowtie, along with Ford and Toyota, this opportunity?
“They’ve consistently utilized the rationale, ‘We aim to maintain an appropriate level of power to attract other manufacturers,’ but throughout my decade-long tenure in the sport, it has remained stagnant with the same trio of manufacturers,” pointed out Larson. “Hence, perhaps a new contender is on the horizon, advocating for reduced horsepower. However, despite claims by various engine builders and teams indicating that the cost remains unaffected, I have yet to witness the entry of a novel participant.”
Denny Hamlin. Getty Images Getty Images
Fellow veteran of the Cup Series, Denny Hamlin, recently echoed a similar sentiment. When quizzed about the feasibility of augmenting power on short tracks, Hamlin asserted, “This adjustment can be made before the upcoming weekend, and they’ve assured us it won’t compromise the existing durability levels. It merely requires a single phone call with no additional expenditures.
“Elevating any horsepower quotient is bound to enhance the competitive aspect. Overtaking becomes challenging due to our constant throttle input. To alleviate this, either the tires or the power output needs to be reevaluated,” he added.
Both drivers offer valuable perspectives, with Hamlin’s viewpoint being particularly intriguing given his vested interest as a co-owner of 23XI Racing. Consequently, he possesses firsthand awareness of the potential actions manufacturers could employ if NASCAR removed existing restrictions. Nevertheless, neither Hamlin nor Larson comprehend the rationale behind the sanctioning body’s resistance to this proposition.
The introduction of more horsepower is assumed to lead to a wider spread within the field, segregating the elite performers from the remaining drivers. While this notion appears captivating in theory, it is the evenly-balanced competition that sustains NASCAR’s allure from one race to the next, as aptly highlighted by YouTuber Eric Estepp. Though imposing intentional restrictions on performance may seem underwhelming, it is difficult to argue in favor of consistently witnessing highly-funded teams dominate the field in almost 40 races throughout the year.
In case the French family isn’t cautious, their on-racetrack merchandise might end up similar to Formula 1, where a single team and driver could easily secure victory almost every time.
If you’ve got a suggestion or query for the writer, you can directly get in touch with them at: caleb@thedrive.com
[ad_2]
